Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > General (L405) > L405 2018MY - Is the 2.0ltr Petrol Hybrid a Bad Choice?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 2 <12
Print this entire topic · 
Eirik34



Member Since: 16 Dec 2014
Location: Norway
Posts: 420
Norway 2007 Range Rover Vogue SE TDV8 Stornoway Grey

I tested a Volvo XC90 T8 today. Nice car, stylish, quiet drive when driving electric. But: the "4x4" system of the XC90 T8 is definitely not good: had difficulties coming up a very steep gravel driveway at our summer house. Reason: Only the el motor drives the rear wheels, and when the hi-voltage battery is almost flat, you only have petrol engine power on the front wheels. The R4 engine delivers 320 hp (T8 system effect 404 hp) and the acceleration is very good. The R4 engine has a bit "raw" / rough sound - hope that the P400e is quieter than that.
Post #455081 23rd Oct 2017 8:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Philip



Member Since: 05 Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 2516
2019 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Aintree Green

Think that’s one of the benefits of the RR system with the electric motor as part of the transmission. On the other hand, the batteries don’t compromise the interior space etc. on the Volvo.
Post #455084 23rd Oct 2017 9:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Eirik34



Member Since: 16 Dec 2014
Location: Norway
Posts: 420
Norway 2007 Range Rover Vogue SE TDV8 Stornoway Grey

Quote:
On the other hand, the batteries don’t compromise the interior space etc. on the Volvo.

Totally agree! I think that the next ffrr (2023?) will be designed with battery storage in mind, avoiding raising the boot floor with 5 cm!
Post #455085 23rd Oct 2017 9:30pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
syl



Member Since: 24 Jan 2017
Location: Somerset
Posts: 30

aja500 wrote:
I don't know SYL...... Taking into account all the stats, which do you think will feel the most powerful while on the move?

You've mentioned the 3.0 diesel is lower on HP, but have you factored in that the 3.0 petrol produces only 450Nm of torque?

The 3.0 diesel however, produces considerably more (33% more to be precise) at 600Nm.

Taking this into account, what's your thoughts?


Play safe - get the 4.4.
Post #455199 24th Oct 2017 9:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ken



Member Since: 22 Aug 2008
Location: On another forum
Posts: 936
United Kingdom 2018 Range Rover SVAutobiography 5.0 SC V8 Santorini Black

Central London so My choice (just ordered) 5.0SC AB Mr. Green

Slumming it in a GLE63s as the L405 TDV8 AB now sold Thumbs Up
Post #455365 26th Oct 2017 2:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Autobiography



Member Since: 10 May 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 917
2018 Range Rover SVAutobiography 5.0 SC V8 Santorini Black

Eirik34 wrote:
Quote:
On the other hand, the batteries don’t compromise the interior space etc. on the Volvo.

Totally agree! I think that the next ffrr (2023?) will be designed with battery storage in mind, avoiding raising the boot floor with 5 cm!


Next Range Rover is 2021MY.
Post #455382 26th Oct 2017 6:03pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
CSK



Member Since: 15 Oct 2010
Location: St Tropez
Posts: 750
France 2013 Range Rover Autobiography 5.0 SC V8 Causeway Grey

How do you know?
Post #455419 26th Oct 2017 11:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RR2008HSE



Member Since: 06 Jan 2013
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 2932
Canada 2008 Range Rover HSE 4.4 V8 Java Black

Wouldn’t the low speed torque of the electric motor compensate for the lack of petrol torque?
Post #455545 28th Oct 2017 11:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Amazing



Member Since: 17 Jun 2015
Location: China
Posts: 60
answers to some questions

Click image to enlarge


Click image to enlarge


first shows 2.0 (jag version) vs other small options. not far off the scv6 but way down on the diesel torque. so without electric it may just be a plodder.

the second I have crudely plotted the phev in full hybrid mode

looks like it could be fun..

still would be nice to know does it keep a stash like the old hybrid so you were never really without when you put your foot down? brochure says"ensures p400e ALWAYS has sufficient charge to provide 404ps power output...when required" it is better to have and not need then need and not have
Post #456520 8th Nov 2017 9:08am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 2 <12
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
<  Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site