![]() | Home > Technical > Is there much difference in rear bumpers over the years? |
|
|
|
| stan Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation Posts: 8144
|
they are the same afaik... |
||
|
| RRUK Member Since: 08 Jun 2007 Location: UK Posts: 3444
|
no differences in appearance, cant say if the mountings beneath have moved or changed? THE INVENTOR OF THE TERM "FULL-FAT RANGE ROVER" :
|
||
|
| duckworthparts Site Sponsor Member Since: 30 Jun 2011 Location: Market Rasen, Lincolnshire Posts: 973
|
2010MY onwards are about £150 more than previous years www.duckworthparts.co.uk
|
||
|
| RRUK Member Since: 08 Jun 2007 Location: UK Posts: 3444
|
Dan, any reason why? The shape is the same isn't it? THE INVENTOR OF THE TERM "FULL-FAT RANGE ROVER" :
|
||
|
| duckworthparts Site Sponsor Member Since: 30 Jun 2011 Location: Market Rasen, Lincolnshire Posts: 973
|
not entirely sure, they do look different on my diagrams though
|
||
|
| CUE99T Member Since: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Glasgow Posts: 187
|
Cheers for posts folks.............. |
||
|
| duckworthparts Site Sponsor Member Since: 30 Jun 2011 Location: Market Rasen, Lincolnshire Posts: 973
|
yep drop me an email with what you need, i'll look after you on price www.duckworthparts.co.uk
|
||
|
| Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 04 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 834
|
The only change is the parking sensors on a 2010. The holders are now molded into the bumper instead of removable as with earlier models.
|
||
|
| CUE99T Member Since: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Glasgow Posts: 187
|
|
||
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|




