Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > General (L405) > Supercharged Driven (Not Slow)
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
kkqd0298



Member Since: 02 Mar 2010
Location: London/Aberdeen
Posts: 199

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Java Black
Supercharged Driven (Not Slow)

Invited to the London Boat show to try out the L405.

Full marks to the caterers (Leiths) for a really good meal before hand, overlooking the obstacle course in one of the halls (more of which later).

Okay so they had pre programmed a route (26miles ish) into the sat nav from the Docklands with a mix of motorway + urban driving. We had a supercharged with everysingle option ticked including the 2 back seats and massaging seats.

First impressions were mixed:Roof is amazing, headrests are great (just like the winged ones in the rear of our current one). But I felt that I could not get my seat as high as I can in the current one. Fine for those who don't have it at the highest setting, but i like to be high up so that my knees are compfy (being lanky). Other thing the start button is a bit more of a reach to get to.

And we are off....20mph zone with speed bumps. It still hits the speed bumps rather than floating over them, no big problem. Very quiet in the cabin, except for the whir..woosh of the massage seats.

Traffic light grand prix...the supercharged just launches...spped camera....damn the brakes are good.

The drive felt a bit jerky, more sports car responsive than a traditional RR feel. Comes across as a cross between a TT and a RR, a very strange mix. No roll but figety steering meant you had to concentrate more than normal.

Right here is the big wow for me (and the reason I can not get a Supercharged)...(this is all theoretical)....plant your foot at 80 and the acceleration is astounding. Even at a theoretical 120 it will be accelerating like mad. Amazing, just amazing....really truly this thing can accelerate.

Sat Nav got lost a few times, the voice on the sat nav gets very mumbled with long words resulting in giggles...but it will get frustrating. The directions displaying by the dials is much better ( and long awaited).

Colours in the cabin are a novelty, and i am not really sure why they bothered.

Junction view cameras are now useful as the viewing angle is so much wider, and there is also a hard button to access them with one click (rather than 3+ clicks currently).

Self parking function is good, but needing a space that is 90cm longer than the car seems a bit extreeme.


Summary, amazing engine but a bit too car like for me. Getting back in ours afterwards felt that bit more tall/imposing/less bling. *Gone* Discovery3 HSE
*Gone* Discovery3 HSE
*Gone* MY10 RangeRover TDV8
Freelander for OH
MY11 Range Rover 4.4 TDV8 Autobiography Black

Post #164075 12th Jan 2013 7:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
kkqd0298



Member Since: 02 Mar 2010
Location: London/Aberdeen
Posts: 199

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Java Black

Oh and the steering wheel feels too small, just adds to the feeling of driving a car not a RR. *Gone* Discovery3 HSE
*Gone* Discovery3 HSE
*Gone* MY10 RangeRover TDV8
Freelander for OH
MY11 Range Rover 4.4 TDV8 Autobiography Black

Post #164077 12th Jan 2013 7:49pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
CSK



Member Since: 15 Oct 2010
Location: St Tropez
Posts: 750

France 2013 Range Rover Autobiography 5.0 SC V8 Causeway Grey

Thanks for the review. I gather you were not impressed with the ride comfort. What wheel size did the car you drove have? 21 or 22 rims?

Post #164169 13th Jan 2013 10:44am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
kkqd0298



Member Since: 02 Mar 2010
Location: London/Aberdeen
Posts: 199

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Java Black

Not sure of the wheel size.

It is not that I was not impressed with the ride quality, it is just more car than RR. *Gone* Discovery3 HSE
*Gone* Discovery3 HSE
*Gone* MY10 RangeRover TDV8
Freelander for OH
MY11 Range Rover 4.4 TDV8 Autobiography Black

Post #164180 13th Jan 2013 11:54am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Tomw2000



Member Since: 22 Jan 2011
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 202

2011 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Java Black

kkqd0298 wrote:
Oh and the steering wheel feels too small, just adds to the feeling of driving a car not a RR.


I thought the same thing re steering wheel. Small. Didn't seem right. MY2011 TDV8 Vogue - GONE
MY2006 Porsche 911 C2S - GONE
MY2003 Defender 90 (JE stage 2)

Post #164204 13th Jan 2013 1:31pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
5.0



Member Since: 25 Feb 2012
Location: Surrey
Posts: 709

United Kingdom 

I attended the same event at the London boat show today and drove the Supercharged AB. My thoughts were as follows:

It looks a lot better than I expected and the things that I didn't like from the pictures (silver stripe on the bottom of the doors, wrap around headlights, rounded front) didn't bother me at all in the metal. It just looks much more modern than the L322 and makes the L322 look very dated in my opinion. I think it is very colour sensitive and wheel sensitive. Dark colour and 21 inch wheels or greater for it too look its best.

The biggest noticeable difference for me was the car like way in which it drove. It is much more like driving a large BMW rather than piloting a large truck. This is down to a number of factors. You are riding lower (not an improvement), the car doesn't roll at all (biggest improvement of all IMO), the steering has a faster rack (good) and when you apply the breaks it doesn't feel like you are slowing down a supertanker. It is a car which you can throw around with confidence if you are in a hurry whereas the L322 does not like being rushed.

A lot has been said about it being more luxurious. Compared to my 2010 Supercharged AB I don't really see the big difference in terms of interior look or feel (the leather seems to be the same and in the same places). What is different and higher spec are the various gadgets (auto tailgate, soft close doors, panoramic roof, reclining rear seats). Massage seats are new and didn't really do much for me, but the headrests are brilliant and the way you can pump up the side bolsters of the seats to hold you in place better I really like.

If I put the seat on the highest setting as I do in my 2010 it felt like I was sat much closer to the steering wheel which I did not like. To get further away I had to lower the seat (not good).

Performance did not really seem that different to my supercharged which was a bit disappointing considering the weight reduction. Maybe this was because it was quieter and went about its business with less fuss so gave the impression that it was slower than it really was. Ride was good on 22s and seemed better than my 2010 on 20s.

Standard 850W AB stereo was very good, I can't imagine that the £4k upgrade can really be worth the difference.

The touch screen system seems about 5 years behind the likes of BMW's interface and is disappointing for a completely new car.

Overall, it is not perfect but still very very good and I can't wait to get one.

Post #165742 18th Jan 2013 7:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
kkqd0298



Member Since: 02 Mar 2010
Location: London/Aberdeen
Posts: 199

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Autobiography TDV8 Java Black

5.0 wrote:

The biggest noticeable difference for me was the car like way in which it drove. It is much more like driving a large BMW rather than piloting a large truck.


That was its downside for me. If I wanted a car, i would get a car. If I wanted a 4x4 that drove like a car I would get a Cayenne Turbo.

The leather on the roof was already bubbling. I know they will claim they are preproduction cars, but still.

Out of the 3 cars they showed us with the automatic boot close, none of them worked properly...not very impressive. *Gone* Discovery3 HSE
*Gone* Discovery3 HSE
*Gone* MY10 RangeRover TDV8
Freelander for OH
MY11 Range Rover 4.4 TDV8 Autobiography Black

Post #165876 19th Jan 2013 12:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
5.0



Member Since: 25 Feb 2012
Location: Surrey
Posts: 709

United Kingdom 

The auto boot close did not work on the one I drove either.

I understand your point re. Cayenne turbo but the benefit of the RR is that it is much bigger inside, better trimmed and rides much more smoothly and quietly. Plus the Cayenne looks awful.

Post #165884 19th Jan 2013 1:25pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
XXXAngelXXX



Member Since: 25 Mar 2007
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 4989

Germany 2013 Range Rover Vogue SE 5.0 SC V8 Havana

i had the same impressions when in testdrove the L405 SC Smile All my spelling errorz are belong to me!

2023 FFRR L460
2020 Range Rover Velar

Post #165919 19th Jan 2013 6:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site