Just wanted to get some views on 2 cars if I may. About to buy. Both from main dealers. Both black cars.
1 a 64 plate 4.4AB with elec. towbar, rear seat ents, 21 wheels, 31k miles. £63k
2 a 66 plate 3.0SE with elec. towbar, 22 wheels, less than 1k miles. £72k.

what would you choose. money not a huge issue. what represents better value and what would be more reliable as a daily driver.

1. for me. If it ain't broken, fix it till it is.

No 2 all day long.

If you don't get the 4.4 it will always play on your mind! 2010 defender utility
2010 RRS TDV8 (gone)
2007 discovery 3 (gone)
2004 discovery 4 (gone)
1994 discovery 1
1970 v8 hybrid (gone)
1975 bobtail (gone)

Then try them both and you'll see the newer car is the one, although if you are after value there are some low miles VSE on 16 plates ( they are essentially the same car as a66 plate none MY 17) and they start around £66k.

Also try the 22s before you opt for them. They are a bit less forgiving if you like your comfort but a good choice for looks and pushing on.

1. from what you have written Alex

2018 Skoda Kodiaq vRS
2009 Caterham Supersport Race car
2007 M5 Touring
2005 Range Rover Vogue SE Supercharged
2004 SL55 AMG

I 100% agree with Basil .

I'd opt for 2.

If nothing else it's virtually a brand new car & will come with at least 2yrs warranty whereas the other will at best come with one & that would be an AUC extended warranty. Paul

MY17 TDV6 Autobiography In Carpathian Grey With Cirrus Interior

1.  All my spelling errorz are belong to me!

2023 FFRR L460
2020 Range Rover Velar

I know that you asked a specific question but I think ........... neither.

4.4 Yes not that there's much wrong with the 3.0 but I found an unacceptable lag when accelerating and I'm a steady driver!
AU Yes, unless you're not bothered about some of the extra features (toys), such as massage seats and winged headrests

But I suspect that there will be lots of decent 2015 vehicles with reasonable miles at about £68K

Good luck and please let us know how you get on.

I agree with jumping , neither.
1 too many miles.
2 not a AB or v8.

Basilfawlty wrote:

Then try them both and you'll see the newer car is the one, although if you are after value there are some low miles VSE on 16 plates ( they are essentially the same car as a66 plate none MY 17) and they start around £66k.

Also try the 22s before you opt for them. They are a bit less forgiving if you like your comfort but a good choice for looks and pushing on.

A well known 405 specialist here would tell you to go for post 15MY model to avoid trouble from early ones.

2, then l=Oo\________/oO=l l:OolΞΞΞΞΞΞΞloO:l

Current
RANGE ROVER Vogue 4.4L SDV8 - 2013 - Indus Silver, on Almond.
RANGE ROVER Vogue 4.4L V8 - 2002 - ex-2003 G4 Challenge Event Vehicle, Stage 3: Australia
RANGE ROVER HSE 4.4L V8 - 2004 - one-of-one Overfinch
RANGE ROVER P38a 4.0L V8 - 1999 - ex-2000 TReK Event Vehicle: South Africa

Previous:
RANGE ROVER Vogue 4.4L TDV8 - 2012 - RANGE ROVER 3.6L TDV8 x3 - RANGE ROVER Td6 x1 - RANGE ROVER Classic 3.5L V8 x1

If you need a tow bar, then you are likely to appreciate the 4.4.....

agree with some of the above though - there seem to be better options about

There's no better tow car in the Land Rover range than the Disco 4, which is a pretty heavy old girl and it uses the very same 3.0 tdv6 as in the full fat, with four hundred kilos more weight so it tows pretty well believe me. Is the 4.4 more powerful and quicker? Yes. Does this really matter in real world towing.....very doubtful.