Advertise on fullfatrr.com »

Home > General > 3.6TDV8 or 4.2SC
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
lewis93



Member Since: 23 May 2017
Location: kent
Posts: 27

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Supercharged 4.2 SC V8 Java Black
3.6TDV8 or 4.2SC

HI all,

I have a dilemma, I have been a proud owner of the 3.6TDV8 Vogue SE MY10 since September last year. Absolutely love the car to bits, currently on just over 70k miles. My brother in law owns a a 4.2 SC MY06 Vogue SE with slightly less miles than mine who is in the process of buying a newer car so I am thinking of selling mine to get his. So my question is, is the extra power from the 4.2SC worth it as its pre-facelift so has less gadgets in than mine. I Believe the SC engine is a very good engine so servicing costs should be less and the turbos are prone to going to the V8. Any opinions welcome. Thanks in advance.

Post #471467 7th Mar 2018 1:42pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Paul thornton



Member Since: 23 Sep 2017
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 545

United Kingdom 

I think going from a 10 plate car to an 06 plate is going to be a downgrade myself plus you've got to consider fuel consumption as id imagine the SC will use miles more than your tdv8.

As you've already stated though, the 4.2 is supposed to be the most reliable of all FF engines.

Unless you are going to be quids in I don't think I'd bother.

Post #471506 7th Mar 2018 5:15pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Alistair



Member Since: 11 Feb 2011
Location: Peterborough / Bordeaux / Andorra
Posts: 7736

United Kingdom 2013 Range Rover Vogue SE SDV8 Santorini Black

Power delivery is very different - I assume you've driven (and are happy with) both ?

Post #471516 7th Mar 2018 6:19pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
appj62



Member Since: 07 Aug 2013
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 422

England 2006 Range Rover Vogue SE 4.2 SC V8 Buckingham Blue

Mentioned in a post, back in the day in early 2013:

"There's a lot of people who dress their vehicles (usually diseasels) up with S/C grilles and side vents (wheels as well). Just buy a Supercharged!"

This was at a time when I was lurking on the Forum and looking to purchase a 3.6, which was within my budget. I didn't and bought a Supercharged instead.
Good decision? Well mpg is pants but I only do 5000 miles per annum. Touch wood and everything else, have had no issues with engine. It goes like stink when you give it the gun.
Serviced every year at a local indy with just suspension components replaced here and there. Fore & aft brake rotors and pads changed by myself and a couple of brake lines changed out. Having the wheel arch rust issue sorted later this month.

So far 5 years of grins with the Beast! Previous cars:
S-Max 2007-2013 (only diesel I've had, good car but expensive when diesely bits go wrong, so what's the point?)
Galaxy 2001-2007
Mondeo Estate 1997-2001
Sierra Estate 1993-1997
Uno Turbo 1987 -1993
Fiesta 1984 - 1987
Fiat 127 1982 - 1984

Post #471518 7th Mar 2018 6:27pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
dolph34



Member Since: 14 Sep 2015
Location: Kildare
Posts: 1724

Ireland 2015 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Corris Grey

If yours has the TFT screen and is well looked after i would vote against the move. I'm.a speed merchant myself but with the right tools. No disrespect to anyone on here but to buy a FF for speed doesnt make sense to me. Same brakes and suspension as a 3.6 ( maybe not yours admittedly). Just my humble opinion.

Also I sure one of the dealers on here had both and said a mapped 3.6 ' felt ' just as quick as a 4.2sc ( unmapped) in the real world of driving as opposed to published performance figures. 2015 4.4 AB
GSXR 1000 K5
R1 1998

Post #471529 7th Mar 2018 7:35pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
TDSIX



Member Since: 19 Feb 2017
Location: Stirlingshire
Posts: 210

United Kingdom 2011 Range Rover Vogue TDV8 Nara Bronze

Map your 3.6 and you'll be over the moon.. they take a serious map those things. My mapped 3.6 felt quicker than my stock 4.4tdv8 and it was quicker in real world driving as it would just go without much convincing, just a little squeeze on the peddle and it would boost away, point and squirt.. whereas I feel the 4.4 needs murdered to get it to give you the torque.. and I don't like to murder it. The SC should be like that too - point and squirt power on demand. 2010 FF 4.4 TDV8 Vogue - Gone
2007 FF VSE 3.6 TDV8 - Gone
2011 RRS HSE 3.0 TDV6- Gone
2003 FF TD6 Vogue - Gone
2006 FF TD6 - Gone
2007 FF 3.6 VSE - For sale
2011 FF 4.4 TDV8 - Current

Post #471555 7th Mar 2018 9:38pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Cam-Tech-Craig



Member Since: 04 Aug 2011
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 16165

England 2015 Range Rover SVAutobiography SDV8 Loire Blue

I wouldn’t have an 06 over a 10 just for the updated suspension alone! Yes the SC is the motor i would have long term but not if it meant going back to old tech, old suspension etc etc

Stick with the newer model... Thumbs Up

Post #471593 8th Mar 2018 12:07am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
wack61



Member Since: 17 Nov 2017
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 104

United Kingdom 

I wouldn't do it unless the SC was too cheap to say no and 10-15mpg didn't worry me( it would if it was a daily driver)

Some years ago I had an Audi A8 4.2 Quattro , I loved driving that car but 8mpg on short trips got a bit wearing after a while

Post #471599 8th Mar 2018 8:06am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
lewis93



Member Since: 23 May 2017
Location: kent
Posts: 27

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Supercharged 4.2 SC V8 Java Black

Thanks for the feedback !,

I’ve got another 4-5 weeks to decide. The SC will be sold
To me at a good price, 500-1000 less than it’s actual worth, and I would be about 3k up after the sell of mine.

Just had to book mine in this weekend for a steering wheel pump replacement ! And after some research the 3.6TDV8 will drop a few thousand in value after another 10-15k Miles.

Fuel economy isn’t a problem for me as I only do weekend miles so the difference isn’t going to be huge !

I now have lots of food for thought 😭

Post #472144 11th Mar 2018 4:32pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JPHC



Member Since: 07 Sep 2015
Location: Kent
Posts: 303

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Supercharged 4.2 SC V8 Java Black

Wait until you have driven it Lew Thumbs Up

Click image to enlarge
 Jordan


'56 SC 4.2 ‘21-Current
'56 SC 4.2 ‘16-‘18

Post #472145 11th Mar 2018 4:36pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
lewis93



Member Since: 23 May 2017
Location: kent
Posts: 27

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Supercharged 4.2 SC V8 Java Black

Out of curiosity anyone recommend a company for a decent map? MY10 3.6TDV8

Post #472831 16th Mar 2018 5:10pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
dolph34



Member Since: 14 Sep 2015
Location: Kildare
Posts: 1724

Ireland 2015 Range Rover Autobiography SDV8 Corris Grey

Hi, i had a quantum 'middle of the road ' map and it mad my 3.6 feel much quicker than my 4.4 tdv8.

Post #472832 16th Mar 2018 5:20pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Harmitans



Member Since: 15 Mar 2018
Location: Essex
Posts: 69

United Kingdom 2008 Range Rover Vogue SE TDV8 Santorini Black

Sounds like you need to have a good drive in the 4.2 SC first before making a decision. Everybody has different driving styles and preferences and in my brief test drives I've had in a 4.2 you need to really be higher in the rev range to notice any difference in performance over the TDV8.

Post #473186 20th Mar 2018 11:01am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JohnnyDangerous



Member Since: 16 Dec 2012
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 833

England 2002 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Java Black

TDSIX wrote:
Map your 3.6 and you'll be over the moon.. they take a serious map those things. My mapped 3.6 felt quicker than my stock 4.4tdv8 and it was quicker in real world driving as it would just go without much convincing, just a little squeeze on the peddle and it would boost away, point and squirt.. whereas I feel the 4.4 needs murdered to get it to give you the torque.. and I don't like to murder it. The SC should be like that too - point and squirt power on demand.


But what if you map the 4.4 TDV8 ? One day your life will flash before your eyes......................................make sure yours is worth watching!

Post #473408 22nd Mar 2018 11:08am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
fullfatrr.com RSS Feed - All Forums


Switch to Mobile site