![]() | Home > Technical > Engines |
|
|
|
| JayMann Joined: 25 Mar 2007 Location: here Posts: 57
|
Yeah it's always late!!! |
||
|
| The doc Joined: 25 Mar 2007 Location: North West Posts: 30 |
The 3.0 was ok but a little noisey in the early models |
||
|
| shmoogle Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Location: Mongolia (where the Mongs come from) Posts: 105
|
From my experience of FFRRs - the TD6 is a noisy old beast.... the BMW V8 is smooth and creamy. It's always struck me that the Jag V8 is a little rougher round the edges, imho. |
||
|
| ENVOY Joined: 25 Mar 2007 Location: up a track in the middle of nowhere Posts: 54
|
|
||
|
| The doc Joined: 25 Mar 2007 Location: North West Posts: 30 |
My calipers say "brembo" |
||
|
| JayMann Joined: 25 Mar 2007 Location: here Posts: 57
|
Mine to and the others one's say AMG!! |
||
|
| RRUK Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Location: Midlands Posts: 198
|
|
||
|
| BlackPerth Joined: 13 May 2008 Location: Perth Posts: 2 |
Can someone tell me if the FFRR received the same disel engine changes as the BMW X5 did between 2002 and when it was replaced in 2007? I seem to recall the Xf started with around 130Kw and 480nm and ended up with around 150kw and 500nm? Did the last TD6 FFRR have the latter power and torque? ANyone know what a Turbochip remap does to the latter engine? I'm thinking if it goes to say 180kw and 580nm it wouldnt be a bad bit of kit as they say!!! |
||
|
| Martin Site Admin Joined: 24 Mar 2007 Location: Shoreham-by-Sea Posts: 31
|
I've got a feeling that the Td6 Range Rover kept the same spec BMW engine throughout its life - i.e. it didn't follow the X5 with power increases, etc. |
||
|
| shmoogle Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Location: Mongolia (where the Mongs come from) Posts: 105
|
I think you're right... often "borrowed" engines don't get the OEM updates. |
||
|
| Vogue Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Location: Highlands of Scotland Posts: 41 |
Well,
|
||
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|




