If it were a goods vehicle there would be less VED to pay
But it isn't  Geoff

Makes you worry that an MOT tester can't read or understand the new rules.

mmm - I remain open minded as the original poster said.
The definition of a "dual purpose vehicle" has never been particularly clear cut . . .

 Where do you go after one of these . . . ?

I have just phoned the place that tests my cars & yep your right apparantley it will only affect the 110 landrovers, disco commercials etc that they used to test as class four. Apparantly it was myself who misunderstood what I had been told. So sorry if I worried anyone

Thanks Tugg if your vehicle is registered as a "Private Car" it cannot be treated as dual or "goods".

Okydoke Gary, cheers - I mentioned the term "open minded" as from previous experience, vehicle classification in legislation is not necessarily the same as those used by governmaent

Other anomolies include "tractor" and "locomotive" . . .

 Where do you go after one of these . . . ?

What if it was classed as a "truck"?  Got - 2017 SDV8 Autobiography in Loire Blue
Had- 2008 TDV8 Vogue SE in Java black
Had - 2007 S/C in Stornoway Grey

Or a jeep?

Now you being silly billys. If its a Private Car and not Commercial Goods Vehicle you are fine.

come to think of it , you do bare a striking resemblance to Ted Heath Gary..  ... - .- -.




Y. O. L. O.
.

Cheers Stan that really cheered me up...

It was Dennis Healey, or rather Mike Yarwood impersonating Dennis Healey, who said silly billy, not Ted Heath.

thanks Kurt,

sorry Gary ,you bare a striking resemblance to Dennis Healey..  ... - .- -.




Y. O. L. O.
.

arggghhhhhh