![]() | Home > General > 5.0 SC or 4.4 TDV8 |
|
|
|
| Haylands Member Since: 04 Mar 2014 Location: East Yorkshire Posts: 8822
|
5.0SC.... no contest.... Pete
|
||
|
| n1cktdv8 Member Since: 19 Aug 2013 Location: Cheshire Posts: 1754
|
Pete.....not an essay, but could you expand |
||
|
| stan Site Moderator Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation Posts: 35874
|
i'd go for the diesel...more torque for easier towing and no doubt the 8 speed gearbox will help.. ... - .- -.
|
||
|
| n1cktdv8 Member Since: 19 Aug 2013 Location: Cheshire Posts: 1754
|
...and being a SC man that's another angle to throw in the mix Stan |
||
|
| Welshdragon Member Since: 20 Jan 2012 Location: here and there...but not where I should be Posts: 1902
|
Yes Stan but you can't have as much 'fun' driving a diesel!
|
||
|
| Haylands Member Since: 04 Mar 2014 Location: East Yorkshire Posts: 8822
|
Just the sound does it for me...... Pete
|
||
|
| Edfors Member Since: 26 Oct 2012 Location: Uppsala Posts: 168
|
A valid question. I'm struggling with the same for a future strategy when it's time to get a L405. But for me the choice would then be between a SDV8 or 5.0...
|
||
|
| discowill Member Since: 07 Jan 2015 Location: Wigan Posts: 47
|
I would go for the 4.4 remapped it is quick enough for a FFRR, I know a couple of mates with the 5.0 SC and I don't see the point because in the real world the 4.4 is fast enough to deal with anything you need, if I want to go fast I will get in my M5 which makes the 5.0 SC look like a 300TDi towing a caravan. A 3 tonne 4x4 is never going to be as fun to drive as a much lighter well balanced car, the FFRR is a great tool and ticks many boxes and I am sure I will always have one in my life but I just don't see the point of a the 5.0 SC in this country (like Jeremy Clarkson said). I know a lot of people hate diesels (me included a few years ago) and yes they will never give you that buzz you get in a petrol but most people who buy a FFRR don't want to drive like they stole it or think they are a rally driver so I do think the diesel will hold it's value better, be cheaper to run and the 4.4 does not seem to have many serious issues. I will stand in line and wait to be shot at by the SC owners |
||
|
| Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 04 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16403
|
I had the same dilemma recently... Chose the 8sp gearbox... Why oh why didn't they put the 8sp box in the 5.0SC 322 like they did a year later in the 405?!?!...
|
||
|
| n1cktdv8 Member Since: 19 Aug 2013 Location: Cheshire Posts: 1754
|
Well I have a text that reads "going to see a 5.0 on saturday morning"....so I think the answer has been given !!! |
||
|
| Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 04 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16403
|
Drive both first |
||
|
| n1cktdv8 Member Since: 19 Aug 2013 Location: Cheshire Posts: 1754
|
what he actually said was "these rangeys better be good or I'm having another cruiser".... |
||
|
| ebajema Member Since: 24 Mar 2011 Location: New Plymouth Posts: 4782
|
It depends if you compare the 5.0 SC to the 4.4 or 3.6 TDV8. I almost bought a 3.6, it needed a turbo changed and I backed out because I didn't know what could have caused the turbo failure and how much more misery was there going to be in the future.
|
||
|
| IanV8 Member Since: 14 Jan 2010 Location: Dunfermline Posts: 502
|
I have never driven a SC so can't compare but I know my 4.4 TDV8 is more than quick enough without being remapped, it is a delight to drive either solo or towing, most of its life is towing.
|
||
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis










