![]() | Home > General > range rover for short milage |
|
|
|
| Pawl Member Since: 08 Nov 2017 Location: West Midlands Posts: 714
|
Fuel consumption on a tdv8 during the first few miles is appalling - until the engine warms up.
|
||
|
| Jayk69 Member Since: 08 Feb 2018 Location: Daventry Posts: 601
|
modern diesel do not like short runs and 3 miles is not really enough to get everything up to temp. Unless you intend to take a long trip home in the evening and with the TDV8 4.4 can be fun as for a big heavy car the do move well.
|
||
|
| mjdronfield Member Since: 04 Nov 2011 Location: Derbyshire Posts: 8000
|
I’m a little surprised the old 4.4 is that bad getting to 30. I’ve been in a couple and they didn’t seem too bad. That said, I suppose it’s all relative.
|
||
|
| stan Site Moderator Member Since: 13 Jul 2010 Location: a moderate moderated moderator moderating moderately in moderation Posts: 35871
|
with those small miles i'd be looking at a 4.2 SC....excellent engines that hardly have any problems.. ... - .- -.
|
||
|
| DrRob Member Since: 16 Apr 2015 Location: Petersfield, Hampshire Posts: 4351
|
4.2 SC. No contest. Avoid a diesel. Gone to a good home: 2011 4.4 TDV8 Vogue SE Buckingham Blue with Ivory and clear glass = "Rory"
|
||
|
| Alistair Member Since: 11 Feb 2011 Location: Peterborough / Alicante / Andorra Posts: 8134
|
Petrol every time - don't even consider diesel for low mileages - more trouble than its worth |
||
|
| Pikey Member Since: 11 Nov 2020 Location: Cheltenham Posts: 39
|
The feeling of speed is definitely reduced due to being so high up, compared to a normal car.
|
||
|
| Martin2 Member Since: 15 Jun 2020 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 802
|
The SDV8 is lot slower than I'm used to, but is plenty quick enough for a Range Rover and suits the way it likes to be driven.
|
||
|
| rainking Member Since: 14 Jan 2019 Location: Buckingham Posts: 75
|
We have a 5.0 SC and my partner uses it for her commute (7 miles of 'B' road each way)
|
||
|
| supershuttle Member Since: 20 Mar 2011 Location: Lancashire Posts: 3962
|
I would tend towards petrol, even though I now have a diesel (and it is trouble free) I always buy SWMBO a petrol car as she only does short runs and I believe that's where petrol scores..
|
||
|
| Martin2 Member Since: 15 Jun 2020 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 802
|
We've never had a diesel as a second car and I had a couple of years in a V8 petrol before going back to diesel with the FF.
|
||
|
| Woofster Member Since: 12 Jul 2018 Location: Toronto Posts: 121
|
I would highly suggest having a battery charger or keeping a portable booster pack in the vehicle if you are only going to be taking these vehicles on short trips. 2010 RR SC
|
||
|
| mcgee9t2 Member Since: 11 Nov 2020 Location: darlington Posts: 2
|
thanks for the replies.
|
||
|
| fanders Member Since: 10 Jul 2013 Location: Hants, UK Posts: 322
|
I've had a remapped 3.6 TDV8 and now a 4.2 Supercharged petrol - both really nice cars, the TDV8 had masses of torque which the supercharged doesn't have, so went better. The SC is very relaxing to drive and makes a lovely whine when you boot it, at the cost of fuel consumption in the 12-15mpg range apart from on runs. But, that's fine for me as I'm doing about 4,000 miles a year in it and being the Jag 4.2 petrol engine, it is fairly bulletproof on reliability. My TDV8 did lunch a turbo which caused its demise last year, but it had done 172,000 miles on the original turbos so can't really complain too much.
|
||
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis









