![]() | Home > General > 3.6TDV8 or 4.2SC |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
Paul thornton Member Since: 23 Sep 2017 Location: Lancashire Posts: 545 ![]() ![]() |
I think going from a 10 plate car to an 06 plate is going to be a downgrade myself plus you've got to consider fuel consumption as id imagine the SC will use miles more than your tdv8.
|
||
![]() |
|
Alistair Member Since: 11 Feb 2011 Location: Peterborough / Bordeaux / Andorra Posts: 8026 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Power delivery is very different - I assume you've driven (and are happy with) both ? |
||
![]() |
|
appj62 Member Since: 07 Aug 2013 Location: Cheshire Posts: 424 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mentioned in a post, back in the day in early 2013:
|
||
![]() |
|
dolph34 Member Since: 14 Sep 2015 Location: Kildare Posts: 1724 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If yours has the TFT screen and is well looked after i would vote against the move. I'm.a speed merchant myself but with the right tools. No disrespect to anyone on here but to buy a FF for speed doesnt make sense to me. Same brakes and suspension as a 3.6 ( maybe not yours admittedly). Just my humble opinion.
|
||
![]() |
|
TDSIX Member Since: 19 Feb 2017 Location: Stirlingshire Posts: 210 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Map your 3.6 and you'll be over the moon.. they take a serious map those things. My mapped 3.6 felt quicker than my stock 4.4tdv8 and it was quicker in real world driving as it would just go without much convincing, just a little squeeze on the peddle and it would boost away, point and squirt.. whereas I feel the 4.4 needs murdered to get it to give you the torque.. and I don't like to murder it. The SC should be like that too - point and squirt power on demand. 2010 FF 4.4 TDV8 Vogue - Gone
|
||
![]() |
|
Cam-Tech-Craig Member Since: 04 Aug 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 16342 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I wouldn’t have an 06 over a 10 just for the updated suspension alone! Yes the SC is the motor i would have long term but not if it meant going back to old tech, old suspension etc etc
|
||
![]() |
|
wack61 Member Since: 17 Nov 2017 Location: Cheshire Posts: 104 ![]() ![]() |
I wouldn't do it unless the SC was too cheap to say no and 10-15mpg didn't worry me( it would if it was a daily driver)
|
||
![]() |
|
lewis93 Member Since: 23 May 2017 Location: kent Posts: 28 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the feedback !,
|
||
![]() |
|
JPHC Member Since: 07 Sep 2015 Location: Kent Posts: 303 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wait until you have driven it Lew |
||||
![]() |
|
lewis93 Member Since: 23 May 2017 Location: kent Posts: 28 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Out of curiosity anyone recommend a company for a decent map? MY10 3.6TDV8 |
||
![]() |
|
dolph34 Member Since: 14 Sep 2015 Location: Kildare Posts: 1724 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi, i had a quantum 'middle of the road ' map and it mad my 3.6 feel much quicker than my 4.4 tdv8. |
||
![]() |
|
Harmitans Member Since: 15 Mar 2018 Location: Essex Posts: 69 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sounds like you need to have a good drive in the 4.2 SC first before making a decision. Everybody has different driving styles and preferences and in my brief test drives I've had in a 4.2 you need to really be higher in the rev range to notice any difference in performance over the TDV8. |
||
![]() |
|
JohnnyDangerous Member Since: 16 Dec 2012 Location: East Sussex Posts: 833 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
But what if you map the 4.4 TDV8 ? One day your life will flash before your eyes......................................make sure yours is worth watching! ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
